Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 04:12

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
10 Amazing Games To Buy Before Xbox's Deals Unlocked 2025 Sale Ends - Pure Xbox
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What are the strangest parts of The Bible?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Turning the Red Planet green? It's time to take terraforming Mars seriously, scientists say - Space
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
The Silent Virus Behind Mono Is Now a Prime Suspect in Major Diseases - Bloomberg
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Scale of how chronic fatigue syndrome affects patients' blood shown for first time - Medical Xpress